Defenses in Idaho Product Liability Cases: What You Need to Know

Product liability cases are legal claims that arise when someone is injured or harmed because of a faulty product. In Idaho, like other states, consumers have the right to pursue legal action if they have been hurt due to a defective or dangerous product. These cases can involve various types of products, such as vehicles, household appliances, medical devices, or even food items. However, it’s important to understand that not every injury caused by a product will result in a successful claim. There are legal defenses that can be used to protect companies and manufacturers when they are accused of being responsible for harm. Understanding these defenses is essential for anyone involved in a product liability case in Idaho. Hepworth Holzer, LLP is dedicated to guiding clients through the complexities of product liability cases, ensuring their rights are protected while seeking justice and compensation for injuries caused by defective products.

Understanding Product Liability in Idaho

In Idaho, product liability law is designed to hold manufacturers, distributors, and sellers accountable for products that are defective or unsafe. The goal of this law is to protect consumers from harm and to make sure that companies are producing safe and reliable products. Product liability claims can be brought under three main types of defects: design defects, manufacturing defects, and failure to warn defects. A design defect means the product was designed in a way that made it unsafe for use. A manufacturing defect happens when a mistake during the production process makes the product dangerous. Failure to warn means the company did not provide adequate instructions or warnings about the potential risks associated with using the product.

When someone is injured by a product in Idaho, they may seek compensation for their injuries through a product liability lawsuit. However, the companies being sued often have several defenses they can use to fight back against these claims. It’s important to know what these defenses are and how they may impact the outcome of a case.

The Defense of Misuse of the Product

One of the most common defenses in a product liability case is that the consumer misused the product. This defense is based on the argument that the injured party did not use the product as it was intended to be used. For example, if someone uses a power tool in a way that is not recommended by the manufacturer and gets hurt as a result, the company may argue that they are not responsible for the injury. The idea is that the product was safe when used correctly, and the harm was caused by the consumer’s misuse.

In Idaho, the misuse defense can be very effective, especially if it can be shown that the consumer ignored warnings or instructions provided with the product. Courts will often consider whether the misuse was something the manufacturer could have reasonably foreseen. If the misuse was completely unexpected and unreasonable, the manufacturer may not be held liable for the injury.

Trustworthy, honest, efficient, and effective - all words that describe John Edwards and his staff! Working with the team at Hepworth Holzer helped me focus on getting well and not on the financial worries of my situation.

Kathy Crowley

John Edwards and his staff are excellent. They took the time to explain the process completely and worked hard to ensure I would get the most out of my settlement. John is a very caring lawyer who cares more about his cleint then the possible gain from the end results. He was able to work with my health insurance company to lower their reimbursement to the lowest possible amount and even ensured I would be taken care of with future claims by waiving co-pays for my shoulder and neck injury.

Lee Morris

Mr Holzer has an above-and-beyond, do the right thing approach to life. He is caring and thorough. I’m grateful to know him and have his assistance!

Sarah Brown

Charlie Hepworth provided excellent legal services to my husband and I. In 2015, I was struck by a semi-truck on the connector and spent five weeks in the hospital. Charlie was referred to us by a friend and we were so fortunate to have him on board. He was compassionate, knowledgeable, highly experienced, and guided us every step of the way. We are pleased with the outcome and having Charlie on our team certainly made the long process of recovery a bit easier.

Guy H.

I am writing specifically about John Kluksdal. The work that he did for me was nothing but amazing. When it was time to go into my settlement hearing, he worked extremely hard and was able to get a justifiable settlement. He's great!

Guy H.

The Comparative Fault Defense

Idaho follows a rule known as comparative fault, which means that the responsibility for an injury can be shared between different parties. In a product liability case, this defense might be used to show that the injured person was partially at fault for their own injuries. If the injured party contributed to the accident or injury in any way, the amount of compensation they receive may be reduced by their percentage of fault.

For example, if a person is injured by a defective ladder, but it’s proven that they were using the ladder in a dangerous way, they may be found partially responsible for the accident. If the court decides that the injured person was 20 percent at fault and the company was 80 percent at fault, the injured person would only be able to recover 80 percent of the damages.

In Idaho, if the injured person is found to be more than 50 percent responsible for the accident, they may not be able to recover any compensation at all. This defense is often used by companies to reduce the amount they have to pay or to avoid paying anything at all.

The Statute of Limitations Defense

Another defense that companies often use in product liability cases is the statute of limitations. This is a legal rule that sets a time limit on how long someone has to file a lawsuit after they have been injured. In Idaho, the statute of limitations for most product liability cases is two years. This means that if someone is injured by a product, they have two years from the date of the injury to file a claim.

If the injured person waits too long to file their lawsuit, the company being sued can use the statute of limitations defense to have the case dismissed. This is why it is so important for anyone who has been injured by a product to take legal action as soon as possible. Once the time limit has passed, it becomes much harder to hold the company accountable for the injury.

The Defense of Compliance with Industry Standards

Many companies will argue that they followed all relevant industry standards and government regulations when designing and manufacturing their products. This defense is used to show that the company took all the necessary steps to make sure their product was safe and reliable. If the company can prove that they followed the proper guidelines and that the product met all safety requirements, they may not be held responsible for an injury.

However, just because a company followed the rules does not always mean that their product is completely safe. In some cases, a product may still be defective or dangerous even if it meets industry standards. Courts in Idaho will consider whether the product was as safe as it could reasonably be, and whether the company did everything they could to prevent harm.

Related Videos

Rules of a Personal Injury Claim

Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney

The Assumption of Risk Defense

In some cases, companies will argue that the injured person knew about the risks associated with using the product but chose to use it anyway. This is known as the assumption of risk defense. The company will try to show that the consumer was aware of the potential dangers and still decided to use the product, which means the company should not be held responsible for any injuries that occurred.

For example, if a person uses a product with a warning label that clearly explains the risks of using the product in a certain way, but the person ignores the warning and gets injured, the company may argue that the consumer assumed the risk. In Idaho, this defense is often used in cases where there is clear evidence that the injured party knew about the dangers and decided to use the product despite the warnings.

The Defense of Product Alteration

Companies may also argue that the product was altered or modified in some way after it left the manufacturer’s control. If the product was changed or tampered with by the consumer or someone else, and that alteration made the product dangerous, the manufacturer may not be held responsible for any resulting injuries.

Verdicts & Settlements

$7,550,000

Medical Malpractice

$5,500,000

Plane Crash/Wrongful Death

$5,000,000

Commercial Truck Collision/Wrongful Death

$4,800,000

Trucking Crash

$4,450,000

Industrial Accident Case

$3,800,000

Wrongful Death/Aviation

$3,300,000

Auto Accident

$3,000,000

Commercial Collision

$2,930,000

Medical Malpractice

$2,900,000

Liquor Liability

For example, if someone adds parts or makes changes to a product that was originally safe, and those changes cause the product to malfunction, the company may use this defense to avoid liability. In Idaho, courts will look closely at whether the product was altered in a way that made it unsafe, and whether the alteration was the direct cause of the injury.

Understanding the defenses used in Idaho product liability cases is important, but navigating the legal system can be complex and overwhelming. If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective product, it’s crucial to seek legal guidance from a law firm that knows the ins and outs of Idaho product liability law. At Hepworth Holzer, LLP, we are committed to helping you get the compensation you deserve. Our experienced team will review the details of your case, explain your rights, and work tirelessly to protect your interests. We understand the challenges that come with these cases and are here to stand by your side every step of the way. Reach out to Hepworth Holzer, LLP today to schedule a consultation and find out how we can help you in your product liability claim.